|
The Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) is a unit set up by the Ministry of Defence to investigate allegations of abuse and torture by British service personnel in Iraq. 〔https://www.gov.uk/government/policy-teams/iraq-historic-allegations-team-ihat〕Much of these have focused on three interrogation sites near Basra operated by the Joint Forward Interrogation Team (JFIT) between March 2003 and December 2008.The inquiry was established in November 2010 after 146 Iraqi men claimed to have been tortured.〔 The unit is led by retired senior civilian police detective, Mark Warwick, and is made up of Royal Navy Police officers and ex-civilian police detectives and will soon be up to its full complement of 145 staff. In January 2013 G4S subsidiary G4S Policing Solutions lost its contract to provide 40 former police officers for the inquiry, and was replaced by Police Skills, a subsidiary of Red Snapper Group, who will provide 100 former detectives. In a judicial review the Court of Appeal ruled in November 2011 that the involvement of the General Police Duties branch of the Royal Military Police (RMP) "substantially compromised" the inquiry because members of the unit had participated in detentions in Iraq. The armed forces minister, Nick Harvey, responded by announcing in March 2012 that that the RMP staff would be reassigned and replaced by Royal Navy Police personnel by 1 April 2012.〔〔(【引用サイトリンク】 title =Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Action Plan Al Skeini (application no. 55721/07) Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government )〕 Lawyers representing people alleging that they have been tortured applied for another judicial review in May 2012 to examine the claim that the Royal Navy Police are not sufficiently independent since they also took part in interrogations,〔(【引用サイトリンク】work =Public Interest Lawyers )〕 and that abuses were so systemic and widespread that only a public inquiry will satisfy the UK's human rights obligations. The case started on 29 January 2013 and a judgement was handed down by Mr Justice Silber on 24 May 2013.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/AZM%20_No%202_%20v%20SOS%20for%20Defence%20FINAL.pdf )〕 In this judgement it was stated that IHAT has now been structured in such a way that it can independently carry out its investigative and prosecutorial functions. It also ruled that the decision of the Secretary of State to refuse to order an overarching public enquiry could not be called into question and said more should be done to address wider systemic issues. A possible solution - coronial-type inquests once criminal proceedings are complete in a particular case, or once it is evident that particular allegations will not lead to a criminal prosecution - was suggested for consideration by the Secretary of State. ==References== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Iraq Historic Allegations Team」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|